ProtectionAcademy
2.255 min · Intermediate

34.5 kV Grounding Banks, X₀/X₁ & TOV

Choosing the weakest adequate zig-zag: the $2.1M grounding study.

You will be able to
  • ▸Apply the effective-grounding criteria X₀/X₁ ≤ 3 and R₀/X₁ ≤ 1
  • ▸Compute the coefficient of grounding and the unfaulted-phase TOV
  • ▸Explain the islanding TOV mechanism when the POI opens during an SLG fault
  • ▸Size a zig-zag grounding transformer (Z₀, short-time and continuous ratings)
  • ▸Specify bank protection, and the arrester MCOV and cable insulation level for the actual clearing time
Standards
IEEE C62.92.1IEEE C62.92.6IEEE C62.22IEEE C57.32IEEE 80
01 · Intuition

A collector built from delta windings has nothing to stand on

Look at every transformer winding facing the 34.5 kV collector. The pad-mounts are delta on the 34.5 kV side. In a transmission-connected plant the main power transformer is usually grounded-wye on the HV side and delta on 34.5 kV, which keeps collector ground faults out of the transmission system. Either way, not one plant winding ties the 34.5 kV neutral to earth.

An ungrounded three-phase system still runs balanced, because the neutral "floats" at the centroid of the three voltages. When one phase touches ground, that phase is pinned to 0 V and the whole triangle slides. The two healthy phases now sit a full line-to-line voltage above ground: 3≈1.73\sqrt3 \approx 1.73 pu, or about 34.5 kV on insulation and arresters chosen for a nominal 19.9 kV phase-to-ground voltage.

Healthy: neutral = groundABCN = G→A faulted to ground: triangle slidesNG = AB: 1.73 puC: 1.73 pu

This module assumes the configuration of the example study: HV-delta pad-mounts (so no pad-mount is a 34.5 kV ground source) and a distribution-voltage POI at 34.5 kV, so this plant has no MPT; its only 34.5 kV ground reference is on the utility side. Module 1.2 compares this with HV-grounded-wye pad-mounts, which ground every feeder on their own.

Grid-connected, the utility may provide some ground reference through its own station. The dangerous moment comes when the POI breaker opens during a ground fault. For a few hundred milliseconds the inverters keep the collector energized as an island, with no ground source at all. That is the temporary overvoltage (TOV) that destroys surge arresters.

02 · The criteria

Effective grounding, COG and TOV

A system is effectively grounded when its coefficient of grounding (the highest sound-phase voltage to ground during an SLG fault, divided by the line-to-line voltage) stays at about 80% or below, at every location and in every credible operating state. IEEE C62.92.1 (and IEEE 142) give the impedance test that ensures it: the driving-point sequence impedances satisfy

0≤X0X1≤3.0andR0X1≤1.00 \le \frac{X_0}{X_1} \le 3.0 \qquad\text{and}\qquad \frac{R_0}{X_1} \le 1.0

The ratios are a sufficient design test; the COG is the quantity they protect (check the exact wording of the edition you cite). The worked example below meets the 80% COG yet fails the ratio test, which is why designers check both:

COG=max⁡(∣Vb∣,∣Vc∣)VLL,TOVpu=3 COG\text{COG} = \frac{\max(|V_b|,|V_c|)}{V_{LL}},\qquad \text{TOV}_{pu} = \sqrt3\,\text{COG}

With an SLG fault on phase A, I1=I2=I0=E/(Z1+Z2+Z0)I_1 = I_2 = I_0 = E/(Z_1+Z_2+Z_0), and with Z2=Z1Z_2 = Z_1:

VbE=a2−Z0−Z1Z0+2Z1,VcE=a−Z0−Z1Z0+2Z1,3I0=3E∣Z1+Z2+Z0∣\frac{V_b}{E} = a^2 - \frac{Z_0 - Z_1}{Z_0 + 2Z_1},\qquad \frac{V_c}{E} = a - \frac{Z_0 - Z_1}{Z_0 + 2Z_1},\qquad 3I_0 = \frac{3E}{|Z_1+Z_2+Z_0|}

If Z0=Z1Z_0 = Z_1 (solidly grounded and "stiff"), the subtracted term vanishes and the sound phases stay at 1.0 pu. As Z0→∞Z_0 \to \infty (ungrounded) the term tends to 1 and ∣a2−1∣=3|a^2 - 1| = \sqrt3. With a capacitive Z₀ from cable charging, the voltage can even exceed √3.

Interactive lab
Coefficient-of-Grounding Explorer
Move the zero-sequence ratios and watch the worst unfaulted-phase voltage. The shaded band marks X₀/X₁ ≤ 3; the verdict also checks R₀/X₁ ≤ 1 (IEEE C62.92.1).
4.70
0.60
COG
79.0%
TOV
1.369pu
Not effectively grounded by the ratio definition
R₁/X₁ fixed at 0.1. Try X₀/X₁ = 4.7, R₀/X₁ = 0.6: the as-found minimum-source case.
024681050%60%70%80%90%100%X₀ / X₁Coefficient of groundingX₀/X₁ = 3COG 80%
R₀/X₁ = 0R₀/X₁ = 0.5R₀/X₁ = 1R₀/X₁ = 2
03 · Mechanism

Why islanding makes it worse

Grid-connected, zero-sequence current from a collector ground fault can return through the utility's grounded sources: in this example a legacy zig-zag at the 138 kV station, reached through 2.5 miles of 34.5 kV line and cable. When the POI breaker opens, that return path disappears, but the inverters do not stop instantly. Ride-through rules expect them to stay online through grid faults, and anti-islanding detection takes time. For that interval the plant side is:

  • energized by the inverters (current-limited sources),
  • connected to ground only through the faulted phase and cable charging capacitance,
  • so effectively ungrounded, with the sound phases near or above 1.73 pu.
04 · Simulator

Size the zig-zag bank

Start with the as-found design (no plant bank) and the 22 kV MCOV arresters: the island destroys them. Enable the bank and sweep its Z₀. Your goal is the highest Z₀ that keeps X₀/X₁ ≤ 3 and R₀/X₁ ≤ 1 in both grid-connected states, while the arresters survive the island and the cable shield, the utility's 51N and the ground grid all stay inside their limits. The islanded ratio is shown for information: it rests on an assumed inverter Z₁ (see the C62.92.6 callout above).

Interactive lab
Zig-Zag Grounding & TOV Islanding Sandbox
Example 74.9 MW PV + 20 MW BESS plant on a 34.5 kV tie to a 138 kV utility station. Phase A faults to ground at 50 ms; the POI breaker opens at 130 ms and leaves the collector energized by the inverters. Find the weakest bank that keeps both grid-connected states effectively grounded and the arresters alive through the island. The islanded ratio is shown for information only: it rests on an assumed inverter Z₁.
27.6 Ω
Weakest adequate (grid-connected ratios): 18.4 Ω
Grid source strength
Phasor view
Equipment
Surge arresters
400 ms
Until 59G / inverter trip collapses the island
40 Ω
Example utility 51N: 60 A pickup, 2× margin
Bus voltages · pu of nominal peak
Va (faulted)VbVcArrester MCOV
050100150200250-2-1012Time (ms)puSLG on APOI opens → island
Islanded fault phasors
0°90°180°-90°VaVbVc
X₀/X₁
−∞ (cap.)
proxy · confirm by EMT
R₀/X₁
0.00
proxy · confirm by EMT
COG
101.3%
Unfaulted TOV
1.75pu
35.0 kV L-G
3I₀ bolted
101A
Bank duty
—
no bank
Operating stateX₀/X₁R₀/X₁COGTOV (pu / kV)3I₀ (A)Ratio test
Grid · min source4.700.6079%1.36 / 27.21150✗ no
Grid · max source5.372.4085%1.47 / 29.22617✗ no
Islanded (POI open) ◂ worstungrounded0.00101%1.75 / 35.0101✗ ungrounded
Representative arrester TOV capability · 22 kV MCOV / 27 kV duty-cycle
0.010.111010010001000011.21.41.61.8Duration (s)TOV ÷ MCOVthermal runaway
Worst state Islanded (POI open): 35.0 kV = 1.59× MCOV · withstands 22 ms.
Design space vs bank Z₀
510152025300123456Bank Z₀ (Ω/phase)X₀/X₁weakest adequate
X₀/X₁ max gridX₀/X₁ islanded (proxy, information)3I₀ ÷ shield limit (=3 at limit)51N share ÷ need (=3 at limit)
✗ Effectively grounded, grid-connected (min and max source)
No plant ground source: the minimum-source state fails the ratios and the island is ungrounded.
✗ Islanded state: confirm by EMT (IEEE C62.92.6)
No plant ground source: the inverter-fed island is ungrounded, whatever the inverter model.
✗ Arresters survive 400 ms of TOV
Thermal runaway: the arrester fails before the TOV ends.
✓ Cable shield withstand (6.0 kA for 0.75 s)
Max bolted 3I₀ = 2617 A.
✓ Utility 51N sees ≥ 2× pickup for a 40 Ω fault
Grid-side 3I₀ = 437 A (need 120 A). A stiffer bank steals zero-sequence current.
✗ Ground-grid mesh voltage (IEEE 80)
Substation fault: ≈ 674 V vs 654 V tolerable touch, scaled from the example study by the 3I₀ returning to remote sources (IEEE 80 split factor). This is a linear extrapolation from the single 512 V study point (the earth-return fraction of the remote current is held fixed), so treat it as indicative. A stiffer bank lowers it here but raises earth current at pad-mount grids.
✓ Weakest adequate source
Enable the bank to evaluate.
Grounding bank
$0.00M
133% cable + 29 kV MCOV arresters
+$2.10M
Net vs ungrounded design
baseline
Example project figures from the source study, for illustration. Your costs will differ.
✗ Design does not close yet. Check the red items above.
05 · Design philosophy

Choose the weakest adequate grounding source

It is tempting to install the stiffest bank you can buy. Once the COG is under about 80%, lowering Z₀ further buys little that the arresters need: in the model, islanded TOV falls from 1.26 pu at 13.8 Ω to 1.16 pu at 9.2 Ω, both well inside the 22 kV MCOV capability. And it costs you elsewhere:

  • Fault duty rises. 3I₀ climbs toward the cable concentric-neutral and shield thermal limits, and the bank's own short-time rating (and price) grows with it.
  • Ground potential rise moves. IEEE 80 GPR comes from the share of fault current that returns through earth to remote sources (the split factor). For a fault in the substation a stiffer local bank keeps more current local, so the substation's GPR actually falls. For faults out on the collector, at pad-mount ground grids, the bank's current returns through earth and cable neutrals, so a stiffer bank raises earth current and touch voltages there.
  • You steal the utility's current. A stiff plant bank becomes the preferred zero-sequence path, so the utility's residual 51N sees less current for resistive faults and loses sensitivity and coordination margin.
  • SLG can overtake three-phase duty. If the bank is so stiff that X₀ falls below roughly X₁ (strictly, once ∣2Z1+Z0∣<3∣Z1∣|2Z_1 + Z_0| < 3|Z_1|), SLG current exceeds the three-phase fault current, and breaker interrupting duty must be checked for the SLG case. IEEE C37.010 permits SLG duty above the rated short-circuit current (up to about 1.15×) only under stated conditions; check the edition you use and the breaker's own ratings. In this example even a 4.6 Ω bank keeps max-source SLG below the three-phase 6,780 A, but check it in your own study.

In the sandbox the grid-connected ratios allow up to about 18.4 Ω/phase, and the utility's 51N needs at least about 12.2 Ω for a 40 Ω fault, so the model's window is roughly 12–18 Ω. The study selected 13.8 Ω/phase, inside that window, on the strength of its EMT results for the island: X₀/X₁ ≈ 2.60 at maximum source and ≈ 2.9 islanded (proxy), with a maximum-source 3I₀ ≈ 4383 A.

Specifying the bank (IEEE C57.32)

  • Zero-sequence impedance: 13.8 Ω per phase, the impedance each phase presents to I₀. The full 3I₀ flows in the bank neutral, so specify the impedance per phase (not in neutral ohms) to avoid a factor-of-3 error on the datasheet.
  • Short-time rating: the bank's own current is less than the total bus 3I₀. Grid-connected, part of the fault current returns through the utility, so the bank carries about 2,460 A at maximum source. Islanded, the bank is inductive and the cable charging capacitive, so the capacitance circulates extra current through the bank: it carries about 2,570 A, slightly more than the 2,510 A islanded fault current. The larger, about 2,570 A, is the bank's own duty in the model. The example study specified on the total bus 3I₀ instead: the max-source 4,380 A, or the bolted "terminal" bound 3E/∣Z0∣3E/|Z_0| ≈ 4,320 A, which is the same plant-bus fault with Z₁ taken as zero. Specifying on the total is conservative, and a reasonable choice when future source changes are uncertain. It gave 4,400 A for 10 s, enveloping a 0.75 s backup clearing time with margin for repeated operations.
  • Continuous neutral rating: sized for standing neutral current from voltage unbalance and triplen harmonics. IEEE C57.32 tabulates the continuous rating of a 10 s-rated grounding transformer at only a few percent (about 3%) of its short-time rating; confirm the figure in the edition you use. The example project chose to specify 400 A (≈ 9% of the short-time rating) against about 11 A measured in the field. That is a special, more expensive specification, not the standard relationship.

Protecting the bank, and losing it

  • Bank protection: phase overcurrent (50/51) on the bank feed, a neutral 51N set below the bank's short-time capability and coordinated with the feeder ground elements, and inclusion of the bank in the 34.5 kV bus differential (87B) or, if it hangs on the MPT LV leads, in the 87T zone (see Module 2.4).
  • Loss of the bank: if the bank trips or is taken out of service, the collector is ungrounded again, which is exactly what the bank exists to prevent. Interlock it so that losing the bank blocks or trips the plant (or at least the inverters) rather than leaving it running ungrounded.
06 · Detection & safety

59G / 3V₀, and ground potential rise

Wherever part of the system could end up isolated from its ground bank (a bus section, a feeder with the bank out of service), add zero-sequence overvoltage protection (59G). It measures 3V03V_0 from a broken-delta auxiliary VT or from the residual sum of wye-connected bus VTs. On an ungrounded system a ground fault shifts the neutral by a full phase voltage, so 3V₀ approaches 3 pu. That is an unmistakable signal to trip the generation off. On an inverter-fed island that means tripping (or transfer-tripping) the inverters: opening a breaker on the bus side doesn't collapse an island the inverters are still feeding.

07 · Reference

Reported example study data

The candidate table below is reproduced from the source study as reported. Our simplified sandbox follows the same trends and picks the same bank, but it does not reproduce every value. Applying the sequence equation exactly to the reported impedances gives about 1.37 pu for the as-found minimum-source case, not the 1.52 pu (COG 0.88) quoted. Treat the figures as illustrative and recompute them with your own short-circuit and EMT models.

The gaps are not limited to that row. For the reported islanded X₀/X₁ ratios, the sequence equation gives COG values about 5–8 points lower than the table's (2.94 → about 73%, not 79%). Away from 13.8 Ω the table's islanded ratios and POI 3I₀ also differ substantially from the sandbox (at 27.6 Ω: 4.42 vs about 6.0, and 2,640 A vs about 3,600 A max source). The as-found row mixes states: it quotes the grid-connected X₀/X₁ in the islanded column. Both sources agree that 13.8 Ω gives an islanded X₀/X₁ of about 2.94.

Candidate Z₀ (Ω/ph)Islanded X₀/X₁Islanded COGIslanded TOVPOI 3I₀Reported assessment
As-found (none)> 4.70 (grid)0.941.63 pu / 32.4 kV1,150 AArrester failure within ~400 ms; needs 133% cable
27.64.420.861.49 pu / 29.7 kV2,640 AFails effective-grounding ratios
20.73.610.821.42 pu / 28.3 kV3,180 AFails effective-grounding ratios
13.8 (selected)2.940.791.37 pu4,380 AHighest Z₀ meeting X₀/X₁ ≤ 3
9.22.310.741.28 pu / 25.5 kV5,510 AOver-grounds; desensitizes utility 51N
4.61.620.691.20 pu / 23.9 kV7,240 AExceeds cable shield withstand
Reported example study data (74.9 MW PV + 20 MW BESS, 34.5 kV tie to a 138 kV station). Not a design standard.
Key takeaways
  • A collector made only of delta windings is ungrounded: an SLG fault lifts the sound phases toward 1.73 pu.
  • Grid-connected states must meet 0 ≤ X₀/X₁ ≤ 3 and R₀/X₁ ≤ 1 (C62.92.1). The inverter-fed island is assessed by EMT and the inverters' TOV behaviour (C62.92.6), not by a ratio built on an assumed inverter X₁.
  • Islanding during a ground fault is the binding case. A bank inside the POI breaker covers a plant island, but not a feeder island: that needs pad-mount or feeder grounding, or feeder 59N with transfer trip to the inverters (an inverter's own 59/59N can't see the 34.5 kV neutral shift through a delta pad-mount).
  • Pick the weakest adequate bank: the highest Z₀ that meets the criteria, so you don't inflate 3I₀, cable duty and pad-mount earth currents or starve the utility's 51N.
  • Size the bank with a 10 s short-time rating (the bank's own share, or conservatively the total 3I₀), plus a continuous neutral rating for standing unbalance. Protect the bank, and don't let the plant run on after losing it.
  • Effective grounding lets you use 22 kV MCOV arresters and 100% cable. In the example project (illustrative costs) that saves roughly $2.1M for a $310k bank.
Assessment

Knowledge check

0/8 answered
  1. Q1
    Why is a 34.5 kV collector whose pad-mounts are all delta on the 34.5 kV side ungrounded once it is islanded from the utility's ground source?
  2. Q2
    Which impedance test does IEEE C62.92.1 use to ensure a system is effectively grounded (COG ≤ about 80%)?
  3. Q3
    On a 34.5 kV system with COG = 0.80, what is the maximum unfaulted-phase voltage to ground?
  4. Q4
    Why must the plant grounding bank sit inside (downstream of) the POI breaker?
  5. Q5
    A designer proposes a 4.6 Ω bank instead of 13.8 Ω 'for extra safety'. What is the most important objection?
  6. Q6
    Which relay function detects neutral displacement on a section that has lost its ground source?
  7. Q7
    What drives the choice of 133% versus 100% cable insulation level?
  8. Q8
    A collector is designed to alarm, not trip, on a ground fault, so a fault may stay in service for days. What does that require?
Mastery challenge

Specify the plant grounding bank

Using the sandbox, write a one-page specification and justification for the 34.5 kV grounding bank that a utility interconnection reviewer would accept.

Finished this module?
Your progress is saved in this browser only.